Swimcloud

UCSD Women, FSC men Top Division II Ranking

The University of California-San Diego women and Florida Southern men top the first 2013-14 Endless Pools/CollegeSwimming.com Division II Top 25.  The ranking accounts for teams' top performances over the preceding month and is the only objective ranking of college swimming for NCAA Divisions I, II, and III, NAIA, and NJCAA.  

The Tritons topped the women's ranking following their victory over Division III oponent Claremont-Mudd-Scripps.  That edged Queens University of Charlotte which fell to Division I Auburn University.

Florida Southern led the way on the men's side following their victory over Sunshine State Conference rival Tampa.  The Queens men again ranked second, ahead of third-ranked Tampa.

This year's rankings utilize a new point system based on a 1,100 point scale.  The new scale uses NCAA time standards and a percentile ranking of all college times over the past four years.  (Read More at our Point FAQ

The Endless Pools / CollegeSwimming.com Top 25 rank teams based on their top performances over the preceding month.




Division II - Women

Pos Team @ Meet Points
1 UC San Diego UC-San Diego vs. Claremont Mudd Scripps 694.7
2 Queens-NC Auburn vs. Queens (NC) 686.7
3 Wingate University All North Carolina Invitational 604.6
4 Incarnate Word Rice vs. Houston, Incarnate Word 599.1
5 West Chester West Chester vs. Bloomsburg, Lehigh 596.3
6 Florida Southern Florida Southern vs. Tampa 590.7
7 Delta State Delta State vs. Western Kentucky 583.3
8 Truman State Truman State vs. Illinois State 568.3
9 Indiana University-PA Edinboro vs. Gannon, Indiana (PA), Millersville 560.2
10 California Baptist Redlands Invitational 547.2
11 Lindenwood Truman State vs. Illinois State 544.7
12 Tampa Florida Southern vs. Tampa 544.6
13 Simon Fraser Puget Sound vs. Simon Fraser 542.3
14 Drury University Show-Me-State Invitational 535.9
15 Grand Valley State UW-Milwaukee vs. Grand Valley State 533.3
16 West Florida West Florida vs. Florida State, Tulane 525.0
17 Northern Michigan NMU vs. Minnesota State-Moorhead, Saint Cloud State 485.9
18 Edinboro University Edinboro vs. Gannon, Indiana (PA), Millersville 473.9
19 CSU-East Bay Mills vs. California State East Bay 459.3
20 Indianapolis Asbury vs. Bellarmine, Indianapolis 439.7
21 Gannon University Edinboro vs. Gannon, Indiana (PA), Millersville 428.7
22 Limestone Savannah of Art and Design vs. Limestone 419.7
23 Bloomsburg University West Chester vs. Bloomsburg, Lehigh 404.9
24 Saint Cloud State NMU vs. Minnesota State-Moorhead, Saint Cloud State 403.4
25 Lewis University Lewis vs. Hillsdale 396.6
26. Saint Cloud State 403.4, 27. Lewis 396.6, 28. Alaska-Fairbanks 394.5, 29. Hillsdale 384.3, 30. Colorado Mesa 380.3, 31. Assumption 373, 32. Minnesota State-Mankato 368.7, 33. Henderson State 364, 34. Catawba 357.6, 35. Shippensburg 322.7, 36. Findlay 311.6, 37. William Jewell 307.6, 38. Southern Connecticut 289.2, 39. Minnesota State-Moorhead 288.3, 40. East Stroudsburg 283, 41. Florida Tech 280, 42. Converse 267.1, 43. Adams State 250.1, 44. Saint Leo 247, 45. Wheeling Jesuit 223.4, 46. Lake Erie 219.9, 47. Saint Rose 213.2, 48. Lenoir-Rhyne 196.3, 49. Fresno Pacific 196.2, 50. Kutztown 191

Division II - Men

Pos Team @ Meet Points
1 Florida Southern Florida Southern vs. Tampa 713.1
2 Queens-NC Auburn vs. Queens (NC) 604.6
3 Tampa Florida Southern vs. Tampa 599.0
4 UC San Diego UC-San Diego vs. Claremont Mudd Scripps 596.6
5 Grand Valley State UW-Milwaukee vs. Grand Valley State 589.3
6 Wingate University All North Carolina Invitational 588.4
7 Lindenwood Show-Me-State Invitational 585.6
8 Drury University Show-Me-State Invitational 570.5
9 Delta State Delta State vs. Western Kentucky 558.5
10 Saint Cloud State North Dakota vs. Saint Cloud, South Dakota State 531.6
11 Pfeiffer University All North Carolina Invitational 524.4
12 California Baptist Redlands Invitational 523.3
13 West Chester Southern Conn vs. Shippensburg, West Chester 519.1
14 Indianapolis Asbury vs. Bellarmine, Indianapolis 517.3
15 Colorado Mesa Intermountain Shootout 504.4
16 Missouri S T Show-Me-State Invitational 476.3
17 Florida Tech Lynn vs. FIT, Saint Leo 469.8
18 Indiana University-PA Edinboro vs. Gannon, Indiana (PA), Millersville 448.4
19 Simon Fraser Mines vs. Air Force, Simon Fraser, Nebraska-Omaha 424.9
20 Lewis University Lewis vs. Missouri S & T 416.6
21 Henderson State Henderson State vs. Ouachita Baptist 411.9
22 Limestone Savannah of Art and Design vs. Limestone 410.7
23 Fairmont State Fairmont State Invitational 400.4
24 Gannon University Edinboro vs. Gannon, Indiana (PA), Millersville 396.4
25 Nova Southeastern Nova Southeastern vs. St. Leo 390.5
26. Southern Connecticut 376.2, 27. Catawba 374.7, 28. Saint Leo 374.1, 29. William Jewell 366.8, 30. Colorado School of Mines 362.5, 31. Bloomsburg 358.8, 32. Truman State 348, 33. Wheeling Jesuit 343.1, 34. Ouachita Baptist 325.3, 35. Edinboro 280.7, 36. Lake Erie 280.7, 37. Le Moyne 235, 38. Lenoir-Rhyne 220.6, 39. Mars Hill 212.9, 40. Davis and Elikns 212.3, 41. West Virginia Wesleyan 196.3, 42. Saint Rose 196, 43. Findlay 180.6, 44. Shippensburg 180.2, 45. Fresno Pacific 158.8, 46. Bellarmine 125.8

Methodology
The Endless Pools / CollegeSwimming.com is the only objective ranking of college swimming for NCAA Divisions I, II, and III, NAIA, and NJCAA.  For each meet a individual are ranked according to their percentile.  These are then compiled into a team score.
  (There is a minimum of 27 swims necessary to calculate a team score).  The Endless Pools / CollegeSwimming.com Top 25 takes the best team performance over a four-week period. 

Each team's specific performance data can be found by clicking on the "Top Swims" link from the meet results.


About Endless Pools
FOR OVER 20 YEARS, ENDLESS POOLS has sold more than 17,000 pools to people of all ages and athletic abilities from octogenarians to Olympians for swimming, exercise, therapy and fun.The broad, deep, adjustable current produced by our custom 16" propeller creates the smoothest, current available. Manufactured in the US, our products meet the highest standards for safety, durability and quality.The success of our business is a direct result of our continuing commitment to customer satisfaction. Staffed with over 100 qualified architects, designers, engineers, and customer service professionals, we will help you plan, install and maintain the Endless Pool of your dreams. We pride ourselves on our high level of customer service and offer lifetime Toll Free support. www.endlesspools.com.

Comments